Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] devicetree, xen: add xen, shared-memory binding

[Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Julien Grall writes ("Re: [PATCH v3] devicetree,xen: add xen,shared-memory 
binding"):
> On 11/1/18 8:40 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >  From the DT binding point of view, it would be fine. Conceptually it
> > would also be fine. However, I doubt that the current libxl
> > implementation would work with multiple mappings.
> 
> I can't see why it would not work. I think we designed the refcount for 
> this purpose.

libxl doesn't see the actual mappings, does it ?  It just puts things
into the p2m.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel