[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [GIT PULL] for-2.6.32/bug-fixes

>>> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> 05/17/11 6:44 PM >>>
>On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 05:24:43PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 17.05.11 at 17:57, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> > No attaching of data to the barrier.
>> >>
>> >> Sure, this direction we agree about. But your change is enforcing
>> >> it the other way around (if barrier then no data), which wasn't the
>> >> case so far.
>> >
>> > OK, even if the code that actually does the bio submission does
>> > not attach any data to the bio? The end result is the same - no
>> > data with barriers.
>> My problem is that I can't see where attaching data would be
>> skipped. The only thing I see is the BUG_ON() you pointed at
>Well, req->ns_segments = 0, so nseg is zero, which means all
>of those for loops never get executed.

This you say is the case for the request you saw the failure with, or
*all* barrier requests? In the latter case, what do you conclude this

Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.