[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [Linux PATCH] Fix to hugepages to work around new PWT handling


  • To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
  • From: Dave McCracken <dcm@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 13:35:52 -0500
  • Cc: Xen Developers List <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 11:39:15 -0700
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On Wednesday, June 09, 2010, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > Recent changes to Linux include code to set new flags in the pte,
> > including _PAGE_PAT and _PAGE_PWT.  That change conflicts with hugepage
> > using the pte macros to set up its pmd entries.  This patch resolves
> > that problem.
> >
> >   
> 
> Could you explain this a bit more clearly?  Why is using __pmd not
> working in this case?  Is it because the kernel is now setting PAT and
> PWT on huge pages?  But PAT isn't even the same flag for huge pages...

For some reason the latest xen_make_pte() and xen_pte_val() are attempting to 
do some magic with PAT, PCD, and PWT.  The previous version of the code in 
set_huge_pte_at() did "__pmd(pte_val(pte))", and the end result was that PSE 
got turned off and PWT was turned on.  Doing the native versions of those calls 
avoids this issue, since all the code is really trying to do here is a 
typecast.

I realize the more complete fix probably involves something like converting 
hugepages to use pmd throughout instead of pte, but that's a much bigger 
change and this solves the immediate problem.

> > An additional fix here is to make sure the _PAGE_PRESENT bit is set
> > before hugepages does a mk_pte(), since Xen depends on that bit to
> > trigger the pfn->mfn translation.
> >
> >   
> 
> Why is the kernel creating a non-present mapping?  If it isn't present,
> why does it matter whether we do the pfn->mfn conversion?

The hugepage function make_huge_pte() called mk_pte() to turn a page and a 
pgprot into a pte before it set PRESENT.  The PRESENT flag was set after the 
pte was made.  This meant that the Xen version of the macro did not see 
PRESENT so did not do the pfn_to_mfn().  My patch sets PRESENT first so the 
right thing will happen.

Dave McCracken
Oracle Corp.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.