Re: [Xen-devel] xen unstable tree hasn't new changes for weeks

[Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes. Unfortunately task switches are bloody complicated, and I have had other stuff to do at the same time. :-( I’m about halfway there. We may do a manual push to the main tree anyway (since the regression tests have only been failing since we raised the acceptance criteria).

 -- Keir

On 27/7/07 08:15, "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

do you mean you are implementing the handling of task switch vmexit?
-Xin

 

---

From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Keir  Fraser
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 3:08 PM
To: Zhao,  Yunfeng; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xen  unstable tree hasn't new changes for weeks

 

Nope, it’s just that the automated regression  tests are failing because we implemented virtual NMIs for x86 HVM guests but  do not yet support virtual hardware task switches. When that code goes in the  tests should pass.

 -- Keir

On 27/7/07 02:35, "Zhao,  Yunfeng" <yunfeng.zhao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 

On xen unstable  tree, the last check-in is about 2 weeks ago.
While at the same time  there are lots of new patches being checked into xen staging  tree.
 
Is xen unstable tree being  abandoned?

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel