[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] Add support for OpenBSD

  • To: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 12:23:07 +0100
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 04:23:41 -0700
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcbzcPNGMem2G19kEdulKgAX8io7RQ==
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] Add support for OpenBSD

On 18/10/06 09:55, "Christoph Egger" <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Is there a standard definition for these functions (i.e., can we be *sure*
>> the original definitions have the same semantics as our own)? If not, which
>> I think is the case, we're better off #undef'ing the old definitions.
> This is the snippet of /usr/include/endian.h:

Well, that doesn't indicate whether the semantics of swap<16,32,etc> is
standardised or not. I'll fix in mkelf32 by undef'ing.

 -- Keir

Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.