[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] Add support for OpenBSD


  • To: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:51:43 +0100
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 01:04:01 -0700
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcbzU2sFqbG+Ql9GEduxawANk04WTA==
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] Add support for OpenBSD

On 18/10/06 8:08 am, "Christoph Egger" <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> /usr/include/sys/endian.h:156:1: this is the location of the previous
> definition
> boot/mkelf32.c:94:1: "swap32" redefined
> /usr/include/sys/endian.h:157:1: this is the location of the previous
> definition
> boot/mkelf32.c:95:1: "swap64" redefined
> /usr/include/sys/endian.h:158:1: this is the location of the previous
> definition

Is there a standard definition for these functions (i.e., can we be *sure*
the original definitions have the same semantics as our own)? If not, which
I think is the case, we're better off #undef'ing the old definitions.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.