|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Paravirt framebuffer backend tools [2/5]
Markus Armbruster wrote: -- The backend still isn't proof against a malicious frontend. This (might) mean that root in an unprivileged domain can get root in dom0, which is a fairly major problem. Fixing this should be fairly easy.Yes, this needs to be done. Sorry if I missed this previously, but how could a malicious frontend attack a backend? And where else in Xen are we safe from this? :-) -- The setup protocol doesn't look much like the normal xenbus state machine. There may be a good reason for this, but I haven't heard one yet. I know the standard way is badly documented and non-trivial to understand from the existing implementations; sorry about that. This was written before we even had the xenbus state machine. + case SDL_MOUSEBUTTONDOWN: + case SDL_MOUSEBUTTONUP: + xenfb_send_button(xenfb, + event.type == SDL_MOUSEBUTTONDOWN, + 3 - event.button.button);Why 3 - button?Anthony speedcoding? %-} I never expected this code to see the light of day :-)Seems like every UI toolkit uses a different ordering for mouse buttons. In this case, SDL stores them backwards :-)
Wow.Thanks again Markus for taking on this code! I hope it's not too painful :-) Regards, Anthony Liguori _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |