[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] RE: Xenoprof in an HVM domain


  • To: "Santos, Jose Renato G" <joserenato.santos@xxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Yang, Xiaowei" <xiaowei.yang@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:15:20 +0800
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 04:15:47 -0700
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcZn9+8ejsr0LEBPTSCYWY9rFnjdagBJi9fg
  • Thread-topic: Xenoprof in an HVM domain

>
>  No, support for passive domain is not available yet.
>  Xiaowei, is working on getting passive domain support with
>  the capability of decoding Xen and kernel samples into
>  function names (but not for user level samples).
>  Xiaowei, could provide more details of when he expects this
>  to be available for others to use
>

Hi Renato, 
For now passive domain is enabled and I've used it and my enhancement to
oprofile to profile VMX doamin.

This is the example of how to use it: 
opcontrol --start-daemon --passive-domains=2
--event=GLOBAL_POWER_EVENTS:10000000:1:1:1
--vmlinux=/boot/vmlinux-syms-2.6.16-xen0
--xen=/boot/xen-syms-3.0-unstable --passive-images=/boot/vmlinux-2.6.9

2 more options are added:
--passive-domains is to point out a list of passive domain IDs.
--passive-images is for mapping samples to passive domain kernel
functions.

Let me show you what it can do. Below is a result example collected in
dom0 while vmx is running sysbench --test=thread:
#opreport
  samples|      %|
------------------
     1322 62.6837 pvmlinux2-syms
      698 33.0963 papps2-syms
       54  2.5605 pxen2-syms
       18  0.8535 vmlinux-syms-2.6.16-xen0
        8  0.3793 libc-2.3.4.so
        7  0.3319 xen-syms-3.0-unstable
        1  0.0474 bash
        1  0.0474 oprofiled

Here 3 entries need more notice:
- pvmlinux?-syms entry means samples for passive domain kernel, while ?
stand for domain_id (it's 2 here);
- papps?-syms entry means samples of passive domain application.
- pxen?-syms entry means samples of xen when current points to passive
domain ?

This is the function level mapping, which clearly reflects what vmx
domain is doing:
#opreport -l
samples  %        app name                 symbol name
698      33.0963  papps2-syms              (no symbols)
399      18.9189  pvmlinux2-syms           sched_clock
330      15.6472  pvmlinux2-syms           sysenter_past_esp
263      12.4704  pvmlinux2-syms           schedule
131       6.2115  pvmlinux2-syms           sysenter_entry
58        2.7501  pvmlinux2-syms           enqueue_task
56        2.6553  pvmlinux2-syms           dequeue_task
49        2.3234  pvmlinux2-syms           sys_sched_yield
16        0.7587  pvmlinux2-syms           this_rq_lock
11        0.5216  pxen2-syms               vmx_asm_vmexit_handler
10        0.4742  pvmlinux2-syms           mark_offset_tsc
6         0.2845  pvmlinux2-syms           mask_and_ack_8259A
5         0.2371  pxen2-syms               vmx_vmexit_handler
4         0.1897  pxen2-syms               __vmwrite
3         0.1422  pxen2-syms               hvm_io_assist
3         0.1422  pxen2-syms               vmx_intr_assist
3         0.1422  pxen2-syms               vmx_io_instruction
...

So it's mainly usable, but there is still an issue doing resource
cleanup. After it's fixed, I'll send the patch out.

Thanks,
-xiaowei

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.