Re: [Xen-devel] event priority

[Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 10 Apr 2006, at 15:51, Tian, Kevin wrote:

> >         Seems current event priority is simple by
> > earlier-alloc-higher-priority style, because event ports are allocated
> > incrementally from 1 and event dispatcher uses bit search instruction
> > to walk pending events sequentially. Is there any plan (or benefit) to
> > add more flexible priority policy, since by current way the priority 
> > is
> > decided completely by compilation sequence of different drivers?
> Sorry, I should say driver init sequence here. :-)
If hardirq 'scheduling' is demonstrated to be an issue then we can 
certainly work on this. There are various possible solutions -- the 
easiest being to simply round-robin scan the event_pending array.
 -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel