| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
 Re: [Xen-users] Network stalling
 
To: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxFrom: Tim Durack <tdurack@xxxxxxxxx>Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 21:59:41 -0400Delivery-date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 01:57:41 +0000Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;	h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;	b=RbSTxsLhCQnpy9COZ8DByF2a6wsjPbJ4cvopS0D4CsFERW9NGSCPZ1EsDQ1c1x89xSp/F9Mnfb0OM162MurAiVuBiVTp3iUxVcHgwv+TYZW0IVNyAq9HjsbzDQJmy+RiJNDx28f/m+RIY4l062Az+aOzu3cgWY4eglgEq4kQNkI=List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> Do you mean the network scripts are broken, or the handling of interfaces in Dom0 is causing issues with a routed setup?
 
 I'm configuring everything manually. The fact that I have to build gre
tunnels to make things work as expected suggests their is something
broken in the netfront/netback code to me.
 
 Tim:>
 
 
 On 8/31/05, Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tim Durack wrote:> Guess I should add my experiences:
 >
 > Running unstable (approx. two weeks old now.)
 >
 > Dom0 vif1.0 -> guest eth0: icmp works, ssh fails, tcp seems to have checksum
 > issues. Building gre tunnels over this works around the problem. I thought
 > maybe this was device driver related (tg3), so I tried bcm5700 with the same
 > result.
 
 > Tried a similar setup with a machine with e100 driver. This time I get udp
 > checksum errors instead of tcp, so dns fails but ssh works ;-( A gre tunnel
 > is my current workaround.
 >
 > I say checksum issues because ethereal is complaining about transport layer
 > checksums when I do a capture to diagnose the problem.
 >
 > Tried various combinations of disabling tx/rx/sg/to with ethtool in both
 > Dom0 and guest, to no avail. Also tried hacking the driver code to
 > permanently disable offloads. Tried looking for the difference between
 > stable/unstable netfront and netback, but didnt get far.
 >
 > A bridged setup works, ip address on Dom0 veth0, Dom0 vif0.0 bridged with
 > Dom0 vif1.0. Real pain in the neck to firewall though, due to all the
 > interfaces. Never managed to get Masquerading to work in this setup, so went
 > back to a routed network with gre tunnels...
 >
 > I can try a more recent unstable if it might help, but I haven't seen any
 > evidence of anything having fixed this. Love to have a simple routed setup
 > working.
 
 Tim, it's very likely that your initial problem has been resolved
 in unstable - Ian, Keir, et. al have put in quite a few fixes which
 have closed most of the outstanding issues we had. I think there
 are only a few remaining issues. However, currently routing is
 broken in unstable, so you might want to hold off on testing current
 unstable until that gets fixed.
 
 thanks,
 Nivedita
 
 
 _______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users 
 |