| 
         
xen-users
Re: Is: Xen 4.1.1, xend, HVM, 3.1 kernel; Was:Re: [Xen-devel] xen	4.2 un
 
| 
To:  | 
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Subject:  | 
Re: Is: Xen 4.1.1, xend, HVM, 3.1 kernel; Was:Re: [Xen-devel] xen	4.2 unstable; HVM; 2.6.39.3; HD/Network card error | 
 
| 
From:  | 
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Date:  | 
Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:14:35 -0500 | 
 
| 
Cc:  | 
"xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>,	Walter Robert Ditzler <ditwal001@xxxxxxxxx>,	"xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Delivery-date:  | 
Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:16:28 -0800 | 
 
| 
Envelope-to:  | 
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
In-reply-to:  | 
<alpine.DEB.2.00.1111081058060.3519@kaball-desktop> | 
 
| 
List-help:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> | 
 
| 
List-id:  | 
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-post:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-subscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> | 
 
| 
List-unsubscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> | 
 
| 
References:  | 
<alpine.DEB.2.00.1107201238440.12963@kaball-desktop>	<!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAOJK0u4CH31Kl5v1RPAzyrZCgQAAEAAAAIMchHuG/6dIqtJ7GgPrsOEBAAAAAA==@xxxxxxxxx>	<!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAOJK0u4CH31Kl5v1RPAzyrZCgQAAEAAAAAKIP0TTIelKl7OMHw7/aSQBAAAAAA==@xxxxxxxxx>	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1107251142270.12963@kaball-desktop>	<!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAOJK0u4CH31Kl5v1RPAzyrZCgQAAEAAAAICr5HMuz3FOpEbmgui+XxgBAAAAAA==@xxxxxxxxx>	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1107251748160.12963@kaball-desktop>	<20111103173837.GA21554@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1111071646210.3519@kaball-desktop>	<20111107212619.GA24889@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1111081058060.3519@kaball-desktop> | 
 
| 
Sender:  | 
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
User-agent:  | 
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) | 
 
 
 
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 11:09:11AM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > > XENBUS: Timeout connecting to device: device/vkbd/0 (local state 3, 
> > > > remote state 1)
> > > > [which seems odds as the vkb from VNC looks to be working]
> > > 
> > > Thanks for pointing this out: I enabled vkbd in upstream qemu but I
> > > forgot to do the same in qemu-xen so as a result you would get failures
> > > of this kind.
> > 
> > Oh boy. Seems that there are a couple of issues here. It might be that the
> > timeout I had experienced was _only_ related to this and the other were 
> > red-herrings.
> > 
> > You might want to make sure M A Young and Stefan Bader are CC-ed on your 
> > Xen 4.1.1
> > patch so they can pull it in.
> 
> Actually I have just realized that the vkbd feature couldn't possibly
> have been backported to xen 4.1.1. In fact I didn't even add any vkbd
> devices for HVM guests in XL in xen-unstable yet.
> Of course this was to avoid situations like this one.
> 
> So my guess is that when you use "vfb" in an HVM guest config file
> you cause xend to create a vkbd device that is without backend.
> A PV on HVM guest would try to connect to it but it wouldn't get any
> response back so it would timeout.
> 
> The solution to this problem is to avoid using vfb in the config file. I
> strongly hope that the config file you showed us before is not generated
> by libvirt somehow. If it is we need to file a bug against libvirt.
And sure enough, if I modify the xm file libvirt creates to be:
[root@phenom ~]# diff /tmp/b.autogenerated /tmp/b
8c8
< boot = "c"
---
> boot = "dc"
20c20,21
< vfb = [ "type=vnc,vncunused=1" ]
---
> #vfb = [ "type=vnc,vncunused=1,keymap=en-us" ]
> vnc=1
It bootes right up. Is this a new behavior with xend? I would think
not - it just seems that the 'vfb' for HVM guests worked in the past -
as Windows boots just fine? And I think the accelerated drivers
for Windows take advantage of that?
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- Is: Xen 4.1.1, xend, HVM, 3.1 kernel; Was:Re: [Xen-devel] xen 4.2	unstable; HVM; 2.6.39.3; HD/Network card error, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- Re: Is: Xen 4.1.1, xend, HVM, 3.1 kernel; Was:Re: [Xen-devel] xen	4.2 unstable; HVM; 2.6.39.3; HD/Network card error, Stefano Stabellini
- Re: Is: Xen 4.1.1, xend, HVM, 3.1 kernel; Was:Re: [Xen-devel] xen	4.2 unstable; HVM; 2.6.39.3; HD/Network card error, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- Re: Is: Xen 4.1.1, xend, HVM, 3.1 kernel; Was:Re: [Xen-devel] xen	4.2 unstable; HVM; 2.6.39.3; HD/Network card error, Stefano Stabellini
 - Re: Is: Xen 4.1.1, xend, HVM, 3.1 kernel; Was:Re: [Xen-devel] xen	4.2 unstable; HVM; 2.6.39.3; HD/Network card error, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
 
- Re: Is: Xen 4.1.1, xend, HVM, 3.1 kernel; Was:Re: [Xen-devel] xen	4.2 unstable; HVM; 2.6.39.3; HD/Network card error,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <=
 - Re: Is: Xen 4.1.1, xend, HVM, 3.1 kernel; Was:Re: [Xen-devel] xen	4.2 unstable; HVM; 2.6.39.3; HD/Network card error, Stefano Stabellini
 
  
  
 
 
 
 |  
  
| Previous by Date:  | 
Re: Is: Xen 4.1.1, xend, HVM, 3.1 kernel; Was:Re: [Xen-devel] xen	4.2 unstable; HVM; 2.6.39.3; HD/Network card error, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk | 
 
| Next by Date:  | 
Re: Is: Xen 4.1.1, xend, HVM, 3.1 kernel; Was:Re: [Xen-devel] xen	4.2 unstable; HVM; 2.6.39.3; HD/Network card error, Stefano Stabellini | 
 
| Previous by Thread:  | 
Re: Is: Xen 4.1.1, xend, HVM, 3.1 kernel; Was:Re: [Xen-devel] xen	4.2 unstable; HVM; 2.6.39.3; HD/Network card error, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk | 
 
| Next by Thread:  | 
Re: Is: Xen 4.1.1, xend, HVM, 3.1 kernel; Was:Re: [Xen-devel] xen	4.2 unstable; HVM; 2.6.39.3; HD/Network card error, Stefano Stabellini | 
 
| Indexes:  | 
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] | 
 
 
 
 | 
    |