WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] New to Xen, looking for advice regarding system configur

To: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <list@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] New to Xen, looking for advice regarding system configuration
From: Tim Bearden <tim.bearden@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 09:23:58 -0500
Cc: Xen User-List <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:25:02 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Rs+0WZ/zmHTDUUJvcjhFOW8RfSirEAtysfTH90hVht8=; b=FE3qUYhRJR/RPqZDwFJUgCKQ20SMYft0W7lOUsxyMjrks75YBiR0lEwjwjyxEQ3TN+ eCtixBQZXFB7AZgv7pvaxBY510oBETq9G8rah5jQhuc9nF/GWt9zhlwtWB/kRa15dZlv Mhe6d2JQp5tYcS3xQ6WaS+jBPLmrtVRZZ2jpk=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAG1y0seHwTEfOsj2qnodPD+-Csr1wmB_QPOnbhStW-d61DR4hQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20110712085941.33e21634@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAG1y0seHwTEfOsj2qnodPD+-Csr1wmB_QPOnbhStW-d61DR4hQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I can't speak much about Xen... yet!  But I can give "some" insight on hardware.


>> Would it make sense to spend extra bucks on a multi processor motherboard 
>> rather than going with a single Core i7 or the like?  I think there are i/o 
>> bandwidth benefits with multi processor boards,


the Intel i7 processor is not single core, it is 4 - 6 cores, each
core is hyper-threaded so the OS will see 8 - 12 processors!  i7 is by
far the best processor to get for a workstation and will more than
handle multiple VMs.  If you're planning to run 2 - 3 VMs, you could
give each VM multiple [logical] processors and still have a few left
over for the VM host.  If you go with an i7, I think your hard disk
read/write will be the bottleneck.

--
Tim Bearden
OpenSource / Linux Enthusiast


On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha <list@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Braindead <Braindead@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> My main purpose would be to support my software development and consulting 
>> work.  So I need to be able to run various OS's.  I don't develop games so 
>> no need for any fancy graphics.  I'm used to the limitations of virtual 
>> machines (use VMWare a lot for dev purposes) and I'm fairly sure Xen can do 
>> everything I need.
>>
>
> You haven't said why you want to move away from vmware. If we know
> what your priorities are, we might be able to give better advice. For
> example, if you're used to vmware-style GUI, but want an open-source
> license, XCP might be a better choice. But it you want something you
> can tinker, or use bleeding-edge technology, then starting with a
> distro that includes Xen would be a better choice.
>
>> I expect to have 2-3 virtual machines running most of the time, possibly 2 
>> working hard (for example restoring a gig+ database backup on one while 
>> programming/doing other tasks on another).  I'll be purchasing 2 identical 
>> machines one as a backup, so I don't need any extra 'robustness' that a 
>> server motherboard/system would provide.  Which leads into the following 
>> question.
>>
>> Would it make sense to spend extra bucks on a multi processor motherboard 
>> rather than going with a single Core i7 or the like?  I think there are i/o 
>> bandwidth benefits with multi processor boards,
>
> Is there?
>
> IIRC the main selling point of server-grade motherborad used to be the
> ability to use ECC RAM. But now some motherboards for i7 support ECC
> RAM and SATA III.
>
>> however due to a lot of database grinding I tend to do I suspect that disk 
>> i/o is a limiting factor in my case which I'll try to deal with somewhat by 
>> RAID0 over 4-5 fast drives.  I don't need any redundancy as all variable 
>> data (code and the like) is on remote servers and already fully backed up.
>
> ... which brings another point. If you know you're I/O-starved anyway,
> why not use SSD? Pure SSD implementation can easily give 10-100x IOPS
> of HDD. And since you say you'll have an identical machine as backup,
> if you're worried about SSD lifetime, you can have HDD on the backup
> machine.
>
> Another option would be using SSD as cache, with something like
> facebook's flashcache. This setup would reduce the possibility of data
> loss (since SSD will only be cache), and have the additional benefit
> of higher capacity (compared to pure SSD setup), but is also more
> complex and (depending on how you look at it) "experimental".
>
>>
>> Do folks generally install X11 on Dom0 so they can get a gui VNC/remote 
>> desktop into Windows DomU machines?  Or is there some other mechanism 
>> available?
>
> Generally speaking you don't need full-blown X desktop on dom0. It can
> be headless with "minimum" software installed. VNC console of domU is
> provided by QEMU, not by X desktop on dom0.
>
> --
> Fajar
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users