WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] XEN 4.0.1 and Linux 3.0?

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] XEN 4.0.1 and Linux 3.0?
From: Mark Dokter <dokter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:58:26 +0200
Delivery-date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 08:01:46 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tugraz.at; s=mailrelay; t=1309359528; i=@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; bh=x3k1px1TKzSHlTb9uPtfa2Pu0XOBqvQekQnJ0OLQdGA=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Ec1a1gk8MiqGreHoUpD2GBV5G6FnR7IG6xQPjXYFCKfaYdnGqMwB+hlijPksPs1Hl eajBGfstHF3F3QDi34JZ6YsCnITRKM8BFey6Zivsol1FvjrBwm6K9BmOT+Y93rf8eZ 3r9Z2QYDIJPZJjU5X+QiExXUc0cIbrbK1y5BkQ7s=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <49A64B97-7D4B-4D42-AF59-5BA562510BE3@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <49A64B97-7D4B-4D42-AF59-5BA562510BE3@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11
On 6/29/11 4:23 PM, Christian Motschke wrote:
> Hello,
> 

Hi!

> I compiled a 3.0-rc5 kernel from debian experimental and tried it to boot as 
> dom0. After scrubbing RAM the screen goes black and nothing else happens 
> anymore. The kernel boots without hypervisor and even as domU without 
> problems.
> All other kernels I have tested up to 2.6.39 works flawless with 4.0.1 (but 
> 2.6.39 lacks blkback, thats why I want to try 3.0). Does Linux 3.0 needs XEN 
> 4.1 or should it basically run with 4.0.1?
> 

Sorry, that this might not be of help. I just wanted to add, that I have
the same issues on Ubuntu oneiric with xen 4.1 and stock
linux-image-3.0-2-{generic/server}

Strangely, *sometimes* the machine boots.
I have the feeling (no proof), that its the plymouth and radeon drm
stuff thats failing *sometimes* I get a "disconnecting from plymouth"
and a console - so not really xen related. I didn't try to boot the
kernel without hypervisor though.

If the console stays blank, there's also no remote access (tried
ping/ssh). The only thing the machine responds to in this state is a
Ctrl-Alt-Del.

> Regards
> Christian
> 
> 

Mark
-- 
Mark Dokter - System Administrator
Institute for Computergraphics and Vision - http://www.icg.tugraz.at
Graz University of Technology, Inffeldgasse 16/II, 8010 Graz, Austria
Phone: +43/316/873-5036, Fax: +43/316/873-5050

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>