WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] Linux 2.6.39 - what Xen components went


Monday, May 16, 2011, 6:49:18 PM, you wrote:

> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 09:27:05AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> On 05/15/2011 08:51 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>> > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 09:34:43AM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> >> Friday, May 13, 2011, 6:49:27 PM, you wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:46:18AM +1000, Joseph Glanville wrote:
>> >>>> Great work everyone. :)
>> >>> Combined with this week acceptance of Xen in upstream QEMU, and I think
>> >>> that the majority of folks on xen-devel are going to have a hard hangover
>> >>> on Monday :-)
>> >> Cheers and thx all ! :-)
>> >>
>> >>>> I assume this means that drivers/block/xen-blkback.c is the last major
>> >>>> milestone to be pushed upstream?
>> >>> There are also some semi-major ones, but right now the xen-blkback is 
>> >>> important
>> >>> since it provides so much more performance benefit than the QEMU one.
>> >> A semi one for me personally would be acpi-processor stuff to make xenpm 
>> >> work.
>> >> But having blkback would make it at least ok to test for some longer 
>> >> period :-)
>> >>
>> > At Xen Hack-a-tron two months ago Jeremy was mentioning pvops acpi 
>> > patches..
>> >
>> > Jeremy: Any plans for submitting those upstream? 
>> 
>> Konrad has a set of acpi patches from the Virtual Computer folks I think.

> <nods> In process of creating a branch of them.


Ahh nice :-)
Something to test again ...

Will give it a spin when the branch arrives and i have the time !

--
Sander


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel