Re: [Xen-users] NIC bonding - missing eth0?

[Donny Brooks <dbrooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2/16/2011 3:42 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Smithies, Russell
> <Russell.Smithies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
> > It’s always eth0 that shows a different aggregator ID. Changing the cables
> > around so it hits a different port on the switch makes no difference. The
> > switch is correctly configured for the port channel.
> >
> > The only difference between the 2 servers is one is running Xen
> > (kernel-xen-2.6.18-194.32.1.el5.centos.plus) so I have the usual virtual
> > interfaces and bridges.
> >
> >
> >
> > Any ideas what might be happening?
> >
> > Is something that needs to be “fixed” or is it not really a problem?
> > eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 1C:C1:DE:74:97:5C
> > peth0     Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF
> The presence of "peth0" shows you still use the default xend's
> network-bridge script. Comment it out from /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp,
> and create bridges manually on top of your bonding using OS config
> files (/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-br*). There's a recent
> example on this list (with vlans on top of bonding) from Donny Brooks,
> search the archive if you need it.
If you need help setting this up I may can help. I have it running 
properly on a few centos 5.5 machines with xen4 currently. I know how 
frustrating it can be too.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users