 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
[Xen-users] Zerofree ?
| To: | Xen Users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-users] Zerofree ? |
| From: | "Guilherme E.J." <guilherme.e@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 10 Jan 2011 14:53:10 -0200 |
| Delivery-date: | Mon, 10 Jan 2011 09:03:34 -0800 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=UBvvYyHrwcedxMIxgOkMpjZ+4yq2D8IT1s4aY1/XdWc=; b=lEahrSrO1thN4Fvjmyf/aM6XRbmGtDCSNw7WnOL0vI9gXu2wbY5zAgSqDv7qLjTg6R i6B+NamtQtxfuzxkywVvOmXDTY8ppn4G6GKlHdjmCRYV3wOw7eUx8GKLs781mUf8lI0j 9LgrCSogbTDLexZIitdw2z8sEGVbgJkA86G1M= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=j/eEiMaCk6p7BZ7mwD6WihurGkcwrnl7MAy7XGuPW2MBia4jE1qijEejrIvJT15kW7 4nsYlCA7f+nJ/9ebDMLlR7PYgBKB1qfyqXBM0lV2YvAHatQS4wwYXIc5B8WVYWZGmhEJ COivHZ4d8O9hzTfkM59BJ3J4MlhVq15ZKy2Lk= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
Hello, I've some xen servers, running virtual machines that uses raw images. Actually, we've been spending a lot of time moving volumes locally to free up disk space, because this kind of image doesn't shrink volumes automatically. I took a look in zerofree website, and it looks to work well, but the author of the patch said that this extra work will hurt disk performance. Someone uses zerofree ? Is it really hurt disk performance? Regards, Guilherme _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] (no subject), Mark Adams |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] (no subject), Pasi Kärkkäinen |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen 4.0.1 failed to compile on Ubuntu Natty 32 bits, Olaf Hering |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-users] vmxloader, mattias |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
