WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-devel] Performances compare between PV domU & HVM domU & PV-on-

To: topperxin <topperxin@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Performances compare between PV domU & HVM domU & PV-on-HVM domU
From: George Dunlap <dunlapg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 17:11:25 +0000
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:12:01 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vQJ+HRWJ+GpY2mqhR+lqFuIpqBLWd66lEcvFEEigu/s=; b=ZjhKPFST+lvyT5MMzqYpl6ns2jJqovl0R+vycX4U8pMnzPfXhe3Dwq8FlaBdAXRHpJ u8IubP8nyIRlNQqEw3uAfC38f9Pvz5c3L38PNp6QGX6nFdnGwC6AiTTqayDdWroOOqJv QGaeB9Cr5cFs1JuUh+R0r4Fe8ENwz9kTagsMg=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=GhlOi+Zz2W9/ubNblhnlZvlIQhvFDtmVEiPnr/BqFgfXf9XZSRvGDzCDDG4X+Gq+dU 5fEDJH6tB3op7V4pArzZVtWX/ts3sbgrVZGNRyBeyvpxB8KPgeQ6/RlaUbxeaxaAuEJb LYJAeaOgbjvqDaeUZRhhqqI33P5yxvGbSggx4=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <a2f6.2c3e.12d112664ad.Coremail.topperxin@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <54c813.12524.12d0d4fd360.Coremail.topperxin@xxxxxxx> <a2f6.2c3e.12d112664ad.Coremail.topperxin@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sorry, not so close to Christmas. :-)

(I did mean to reply to this, but I haven't had time -- I'll try after
I return in the new year.)

Peace,
 -George

2010/12/23 topperxin <topperxin@xxxxxxx>:
> no one want to discuss the advantages between PV domU & HVM domU?
>
> At 2010-12-22 17:01:31,topperxin <topperxin@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> hi all
>     As we all know, xen currently support these three types domU mode, and
> every mode has it's own features, such as:
>         Advantages                 Disadvantages
>    PV:  Good I/O performance        Have to modify the domU kernel
>         Hardware Independent        Can't support windows
>
> HVM: no need to modify kernel    not good at I/O performance
>         support various OS include  Hardware dependent(VT)
>         linux, windows
> PV-on-HVM: Optimize the I/O           Have to transplant the pv
>   performance with pv drivers   drivers between various kernel
>   support various OS include    versions
>         linux, windows
>         1.Are the compare right? Or where can I get the more detailed
> performance compare given by the government? Specially, what about I/O
> performance between PV & PV-on-HVM???
>          2.When I choose domU mode, what conditions should I care for?
>          3.Is PV can use VT hardware technology?
>          4.In future, which modes will become the main direction?
>         Any reply will be appreciated, thanks a lot.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>