xen-users

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Xen-users] Vif rate limiting

from [Dmitry Lohansky]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [Xen-users] Vif rate limiting
From:	Dmitry Lohansky <d.lohansky@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 9 Sep 2010 17:56:11 +0400
Delivery-date:	Thu, 09 Sep 2010 06:58:14 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Trygve Sanne Hardersen wrote:

> Not really, limiting incoming traffic is much harder. With TCP/IP it's
> easy to control how much is sent, more difficult to control how much
> is received. However most web sites only care about the outgoing
> bandwidth so it's probably sufficient in most cases.

There is a way to limit the incoming traffic for domU in dom0 on vif with tc.

For example:

dom0:~ # tc qdisc add dev vif1.0 root handle 1: htb default 1
dom0:~ # tc class add dev vif1.0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 5mbit

> Trygve

> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Chris <tknchris@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Strange that it only works one direction
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>

-- 
Dmitry Lohansky
CEO Oversun-Scalaxy
------------------------------------------------------------›>}>----------
d.lohansky@xxxxxxxxxx | www.scalaxy.ru
Mob: +7 985 724 15 42

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [Xen-users] Vif rate limiting, Dmitry Lohansky <= RE: [Xen-users] Vif rate limiting, admin Re: [Xen-users] Vif rate limiting, Dmitry Lohansky

Previous by Date:	Re: [Xen-users] [SPAM] finding PV guest or HVM on command line, Fajar A. Nugraha
Next by Date:	[Xen-users] Xen4: problem with vcpu_avail, Jan Marquardt
Previous by Thread:	[Xen-users] [SPAM] finding PV guest or HVM on command line, Tapas Mishra
Next by Thread:	RE: [Xen-users] Vif rate limiting, admin
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]