WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] iozone tested in domU performs better than dom0?

To: ma qiang <maqiang1984@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] iozone tested in domU performs better than dom0?
From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:29:50 +0700
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:31:16 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <AANLkTim7vPp-TA-nGMMqZaFaWB6kkvx-yV69kn6LiKZd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <AANLkTim7vPp-TA-nGMMqZaFaWB6kkvx-yV69kn6LiKZd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 9:54 AM, ma qiang <maqiang1984@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi all,
    I have run iozone in domU, and the results performs better than
in dom0?  In my options, dom0 should perform like physical host, and
better than domU.
    Why?


Are you using file-backed domUs? If yes, then possibly it's dom0 caching effect.

-- 
Fajar
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>