WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

RE: [Xen-devel] DomU as Dom0?

To: Daniel Stodden <daniel.stodden@xxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Goirand <thomas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] DomU as Dom0?
From: "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:32:05 +0800
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>, Xen List <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:35:37 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1266229006.9492.38.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <529a12f41002111143t6f41924ey46e4ef940d7c9969@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1265924495.9385.84.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <529a12f41002112223j4bd55064y427cdb9dc84315f6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B75075A.4090909@xxxxxxxxxx> <1266229006.9492.38.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcquLPLDqU3R6WlBRN+dLCAxzJHkwgALylXg
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] DomU as Dom0?
Daniel Stodden wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 02:46 -0500, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Sassy Natan wrote:
>>> OK,
>>> 
>>> Thanks for the answers
>>> 
>>> Sassy
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Daniel Stodden
>>> <daniel.stodden@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:daniel.stodden@xxxxxxxxxx>>
>>>     wrote: If you're rather looking for recursive virtualization, I
>>>     don't think that's going to fly all that well either.
>>> 
>>>     Daniel
>> 
>> 
>> It's called "nested virtualization" (not recursive) and there was a

It is just a name difference. It is actually recursivable as if the CPU is 
power enough.

>> talk about it on the last Xen Summit in Shanghai. I suggest you to
>> read the video: 
>> 
>> http://www.xen.org/files/xensummit_intel09/xensummit-nested-virt.pdf
>> http://www.xen.org/media/Movies/XenSummitAsia09/2009-11-19-afternoon/NestedVirtualization.MTS
> 
> Ah, nice. I didn't expect VMX emulation be actually in the works
> somewhere. Cool, thanks for the link.
> 
> "Recursive" was the original term for such a beast.
> 
> Any estimates on the footprint? Small enough to be a candidate for
> inclusion? It'd certainly be interesting for some applications.

It should be very small. Probably 2-3K LOC, we are still working on some 
tunning and polishing work. 

Thx, Eddie
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel