WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

[Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] ntpd under Xen Dom0 exhibits extremely high

To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] ntpd under Xen Dom0 exhibits extremely high jitter/noise? runs stable/quiet under non-xen kernel.
From: mail ignored <0.bugs.only.0@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:26:10 -0800
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen User-List <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:26:29 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=b95zuMvKjYGfcsAoy/naU1qqzHSd9cWUtovKrwvBoFo=; b=tdd/bmpOsFt/ZSDX5FxDNvKRn/nMvotr1tQ2KD8Qp5jXEaaIJgvW2IS/duIkEqsTt+ jueUSdMiu86VYk/wk8KHLC2UpKzzs829nuIwS2+1+8Hour0OVecJ4B7Bd6+KZWyryjn9 jcaKMMse58O1ICNb7D8d5VD9jtK9e9GgSpIu8=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=mnLvMhLEZ3mAHQ8X0Q3c12SfTdSin7yujzFtyhQOTFSCcgz2m/IsZ+AVpN6lPP+A14 ibcjvEkQZNg8afGc5Lq4QsPNHGd9K08ssLbCE2FGINn2//m03GTvXNKQntyyf8AxrDNF ce4+rvefRA48AGgxVCZnn44gWwklU1+CPbYqQ=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <c67eed301001181019v764a85e0v902de7ebbd7e6413@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <c67eed301001171421y5e7cbd02me2e5753922bc1c44@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C779BDF0.6799%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <c67eed301001180921u6ab1771fq764d51c9ddf92ab9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <c67eed301001181019v764a85e0v902de7ebbd7e6413@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
wrt acpi vs pit,

reading @ http://the-b.org/Linux_timers, it seems (?) acpi may be, in
general, the better options, as pit " ... doesn't gain lost time
because it doesn't have lost tick correction code ..."

iiuc, that references those timers @kernel -- not clear if it is/isn't
relevant to Xen ...

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>