WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] rebased openSUSE dom0 xen patches for 2.6.31 , 2.6.31.8

To: Andrew Lyon <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] rebased openSUSE dom0 xen patches for 2.6.31 , 2.6.31.8 xenified seems to work stable
From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 04:36:47 -0800 (PST)
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 04:38:44 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1261053407; bh=rE0Tqt+Gj2gHCxkcwv1qOHJgOHSHcYupK2mVa5duUFU=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=WUSGvXpS9FC6cZ9jO3lkEMKhrq6AOphdPRKWjgxkAcTNIe6KFjEBEe2hQwtYSwIVeskAAoQclZ9kj+dcDLqxhrV4zG14K7LSId0XP6yCWGmeqEdjMdWRdgBTE62BAiKyfJ/G3YKldc4npXG+FzUAe8GJAgI1U0wGFJ2FrOxQigQ=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=IpalQC4C7o3gLFf6uhRyPYSWfVytDXvNOfp0IQ7cKJWsopyvcL/UrmV7PD8XqFwlpI/hChEvE599nAVwpX/ckQEKP5xnVVhSoz4rjGPW6gHyTlgcYU+ahVNeHakmXi7DUn3Zo7E+9/Zhv4Gox/O3Ohc7Zu4jgO60yrf7LHMaKn0=;
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <f4527be0912170209x7437828cs8a3002f4ee383056@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <f4527be0912160900h2d09e8bdj2e5db107ae0aa41a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7207d96f0912162323m3ecaf21fv9a56656e711a8e59@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f4527be0912170034w1ac6a9f5na583b23d9fff6dd7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <915537.7908.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f4527be0912170209x7437828cs8a3002f4ee383056@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Xenified 2.6.31.8 via Andy's rebased patches per openSUSE  under Xen 3.4.2 on top of Ubuntu 9.04 Server
handles complete install F12 PV DomU (with ext4 for boot fs, Xen 3.4.2 patched per MRJ ) on phy:/dev/sda7 device.
Compare with     https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553690

Boris.


>
>
> From: Andrew Lyon <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: Fajar A. Nugraha <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: xen-users List <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thu, December 17, 2009 11:34:19 AM
> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] rebased openSUSE dom0 xen patches for 2.6.31
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha <fajar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Andrew Lyon <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have uploaded a new set of rebased openSUSE dom0 xen patches and
>>> Gentoo ebuild for 2.6.31 to
>>> http://code.google.com/p/gentoo-xen-kernel/downloads/list
>>
>> Andrew, which kernel do you use as base? I tried appying it to vanilla
>> 2.6.31 and 2.6.31.8, it failed to apply cleanly
>>
>
> The patches will apply to 2.6.31.7 or 2.6.31.8, you need to apply them
> with -p1 and In numeric order, I just used a simple loop to test that
> they apply cleanly:
>
> linux-2.6.31 # patch -p1 -s -i
> /home/andy/patches.kernel.org/patch-2.6.31.7-8
> ubermicro linux-2.6.31 # mkdir xenpatch
> ubermicro linux-2.6.31 # cd xenpatch
> ubermicro xenpatch # tar jxf /home/distfiles/xen-patches-2.6.31-9.tar.bz2
> ubermicro xenpatch # cd ..
> ubermicro linux-2.6.31 # ls xenpatch/ | sort | while read file ; do
> patch -p1 -s -i xenpatch/$file  ; done
>
> No errors, you must be doing something wrong.
>
> Andy
>
>> patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_resource/vi_resource_manager.c
>> patching file drivers/net/sfc/Kconfig
>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 12.
>> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>> drivers/net/sfc/Kconfig.rej
>> patching file drivers/net/sfc/Makefile
>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 1.
>> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>> drivers/net/sfc/Makefile.rej
>> can't find file to patch at input line 19488
>> Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>> The text leading up to this was:
>> --------------------------
>> |--- head-2009-07-28.orig/drivers/net/sfc/driverlink.c  2009-07-28
>> 10:04:25.000000000 +0200
>> |+++ head-2009-07-28/drivers/net/sfc/driverlink.c       2009-07-28
>> 10:05:40.000000000 +0200
>> --------------------------
>>
>>
>> .... and lots more like that.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Fajar
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>