On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Javier Guerra <
javier@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Steven Anderson wrote:
>> I was trying to understand why one wouldnt use LV snapshots
>
> because it gives you a backup of a 'dirty' filesystem. that is, a snapshot when it's mounted, and without any guarantees about all processes having flushed important data to disk.
>
> recovering from such a backup is to the system just like recovering from a 'pull the plug' event. In most cases an fsck is enough and the (little) lost data is within reason for a catastrophic failure. In other cases (usually when a busy database is involved), it's just not OK, you could recover data that is totally inconsistent, maybe needing a complex analysis to bring it back to a reasonable state.
>
> IOW, it's better to use a 'normal' backup system, and be sure to get cooperation from any DB system.
>
> --
> Javier
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
>
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>