WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] About profiling xen

To: Marco Tizzoni <marco.tizzoni@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] About profiling xen
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:19:03 -0700
Cc: "Fajar A." <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>, Fasiha Ashraf <feehapk@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xen <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:19:53 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <f9611b0f0909300045o55e22378xea270e9873471f1d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <196324.1267.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f9611b0f0909292333r7da0c616rbe53ca73a6ea512d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090930063747.GG1434@xxxxxxxxxxx> <f9611b0f0909292340o6a53326aobcd87334d7cfaa6b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f9611b0f0909300045o55e22378xea270e9873471f1d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090814 Fedora/3.0-2.6.b3.fc11 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b3
On 09/30/09 00:45, Marco Tizzoni wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Marco Tizzoni <marco.tizzoni@xxxxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
>   
>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>     
>>> 250 per second.. sounds like kernel HZ value?
>>>       
>> Yes, infact I'm going to test it with 1000Khz. Stay tuned.
>>     
> Building dom0 kernel with 1000hz the rate reach 1k. Ok, one point. Then?
> Why this behaviour occurs only on xenolinux?
>   

Which kernel are you using?  Do you have:

CONFIG_NO_HZ=y
CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y

configured?

    J

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>