WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

[Xen-users] xen topology

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-users] xen topology
From: William <xen-mailinglist@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:33:34 -0400
Delivery-date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:34:18 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608)
Hi,

I'm working about a new xen topology and I'm looking for advices or critics.
For information, I would like to virtualize asterisk servers (without T1 cards).

For the moment, I need 3 servers but I don't know what is the better solution for the data : iscsi or fiber channel technologies ?

On each physical server, there will be 3 or 4 virtual servers and I would like to centralize xen images to install an high availability solution (with monit, heartbeat, etc.)

Finally, about the network, is it better to use bonding solution or to use 1 physical NIC for x domU ?

Thanks.


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Xen-users] xen topology, William <=