 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs
| To: | Christopher Chen <muffaleta@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs |
| From: | Jia Rao <rickenrao@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 7 Aug 2009 10:11:47 -0400 |
| Cc: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Fri, 07 Aug 2009 07:12:34 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=8lISxDv2Z5hQpv1F6+kam/O7SSOyLNBrQ3MKmEF/qtY=; b=fV7kh5MICJ8dH8UzNmpWXlNgip5qDY5WI5a2Rj52kZTwA7eUGtlxPhhIr9OPnIwqO+ dtS+bHognCfpfw9IJCnkilhkBtccIgCsG9WtfxYf8jx3one4jM3d/wKzG8P9ZiSfshSx iYOk3lrtuR3bBHuEqWuB9qEenvZm6W0f5wN/0= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=OlcIuWL5z4cqEtR7xSFe88hXuL1v4N08lhT2902eENKpNp//xhRuN2cMYXv9JnPNQg ikyTiZyvVtkkgP40dXuaFtemQ7p6MWBNzLm50FvKv4fxiRYTrjPIpXY/pq1J/tvBUvl8 Sj1wgElDZL/6f7UCl9yfWZShnryTjo8GGv7z8= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <7bc80d500908070700s7050c766g4d1c6af2cd71ea89@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <994429490908070648s69eed40eua19efc43c3eb85a7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7bc80d500908070700s7050c766g4d1c6af2cd71ea89@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
Thank you very much for the prompt replies. My intention of moving to iscsi is due to pure performance purpose. The physical hosts and the storage server are connected through a 1G switch. The storage server uses raid-5 disk array. My current testing using iozone within VMs on both iscsi and nfs produced similar performance results for sequential and random read. I was told it will make a big difference if there are 10-15 VMs sharing the storage server. In my case, I have 8-10 VMs. Any experience with a larger number of VMs in both nfs and iscsi? Jia. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] Load Balancing, François Delpierre |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, François Delpierre |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Christopher Chen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] iscsi vs nfs for xen VMs, Dustin Black |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
