WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

RE: [Xen-users] Is it Xen or Vista?

To: "Wolfgang Formann" <wformann@xxxxxxxx>, <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Is it Xen or Vista?
From: "James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 13:52:25 +1000
Cc:
Delivery-date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:53:22 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4A33F95A.5090305@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4A33F4C0.7020308@xxxxxxxx> <4A33F95A.5090305@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcnsWp6XIRjV63ieS421NG45ROZklwASNPgQ
Thread-topic: [Xen-users] Is it Xen or Vista?
> 
> Wolfgang Formann wrote:
> > Helloo!
> >
> > I was trying to install Vista (32bit) and during the reboot after
> > service pack 1 (SP1 of Vista) it suddenly vanishes with this message
> > in /var/log/xen/xend.log
> >
> > [2009-06-13 20:38:23 4495] WARNING (XendDomainInfo:1283) Domain has
crashed:
> name=vista32 id=46.
> 
> Maybe xm dmesg can help a little bit more:
> 
> (XEN) ----[ Xen-3.2.1_16881_04-4.2  x86_64  debug=n  Not tainted ]----
> (XEN) CPU:    7
> (XEN) RIP:    001b:[<000000007098affa>]
> (XEN) RFLAGS: 0000000000000246   CONTEXT: hvm
> (XEN) rax: 0000000000100f42   rbx: 0000000000000800   rcx:
0000000000802001
> (XEN) rdx: 000000000789fbff   rsi: 000000007098af84   rdi:
0000000000000002
> (XEN) rbp: 00000000009ef27c   rsp: 00000000009ef25c   r8:
0000000000000000
> (XEN) r9:  0000000000000000   r10: 0000000000000000   r11:
0000000000000000
> (XEN) r12: 0000000000000000   r13: 0000000000000000   r14:
0000000000000000
> (XEN) r15: 0000000000000000   cr0: 000000008001003b   cr4:
00000000000006b9
> (XEN) cr3: 000000003e1f72c0   cr2: 0000000000000000
> (XEN) ds: 0023   es: 0023   fs: 003b   gs: 0000   ss: 0023   cs: 001b
> (XEN) svm.c:90:d46 Bad instruction length 0
> (XEN) domain_crash called from svm.c:91
> (XEN) Domain 46 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#1:
> 
> The full output is available here:
> http://nopaste.com/p/awnz8wAwe
> 

I think that's just a bug in Xen 3.2.1... it looks very similar to
something I saw too. Try something newer.

James


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>