WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] please help: Linux Kernel must be loaded before initrd

To: xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] please help: Linux Kernel must be loaded before initrd
From: Rudi Ahlers <rudiahlers@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 22:27:09 +0200
Delivery-date: Sun, 07 Jun 2009 13:27:53 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=oZJvt9T63iUSo7c31xxtMRHOBUVZjvsSyZU/7+YTYM8=; b=IOng3MPPVAGhUPNEFWoJT83OsQyBJTwpiOSXAKCcyaQB+i/eFtinva5U8wvayDa5fb ljic+9fABSP4ya9Y5GKDRvBsOSk6K7llZvchUlO3zZpxsEEVb2p+lK3MRz8MXhQrwpek XAQG2r+SMG72k9DjWp3vqp2NdzKZu1Fi3kj2w=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=CajH3s1HBUg+iD82V+YxRdjTJEqVjWrYzvaV6abqYUhwmaykCqkqIOXLvWv8dV4iIP FiVxClzQ5esdm2fALNC3kfVBwP3IOb6tvmLUlJvd98p4EMFpcvNe/akZOiDG9556zucY fvnE5VjHnAj9ipdDzK1GIpbegwx7lPvG03Wj8=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4A2C2191.3020702@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <695200da0906070434w7eed0157t794e61169927d29c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7207d96f0906070533n570531e2s7dae070645872eb0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <695200da0906070727g1d4d5ac0l4e9f31e2d32efa02@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A2BD260.5090508@xxxxxxxxxx> <695200da0906070829s5d5c990doc42d91080bb8cad7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A2C2191.3020702@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Thomas Goirand <thomas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I do agree that a KVM is a good option, but also found that a properly
> configured server never needs it.

ANY server ALWAYS need it. Simply because it can fail and you might need
to access the BIOS to disable an HDD, or simply reboot the server, or
again boot on a diagnostic server. Now that I use KVMs everywhere, I
just feel I'm BLIND when I don't have one, and I hate the feeling.

Well, each to his own, I suppose :) I don't really sit and work on servers every moment of the day :)
 


> So, where I save
> money on the KVM, I pay it for server management, and this also cuts
> down support costs on my side a bit.

What saving are we talking about here? 100 USD per server wont make your
accountant have a heart attack ... But loosing precious time can make
your customers run away.

Well, with a KVM, I meant that I would need to sit and fix the problem, or pay a tech's  salary to sit and fix the problem. It's more than often cheaper to pay the IDC to manage the servers, since time is valuable to me.
 


Thomas

P.S: PLEASE, do NOT Cc: when replying. This is just plain wrong (by
default you should never do this), and anyway, I'm registered to the list.

Please don't take offense in this, my gmail account replies to all, by default.


_______________________________________________


--
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
CEO, SoftDux Hosting
Web: http://www.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
Cell: 082 554 7532
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users