WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

[Xen-users] AW: Another question about msi.

To: "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-users] AW: Another question about msi.
From: Carsten Schiers <carsten@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:04:00 +0100
Cc:
Delivery-date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 02:04:52 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <E2263E4A5B2284449EEBD0AAB751098401CE820A27@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks again, it's production, but fortunately, the clients is my family ;o). 
It's
a home server. I will simply try, but I wait for 3.4 to release. It makes me 
feel
more safe...

BR,
Carsten.

----- Originalnachricht -----
Von: "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
Gesendet: Fre, 27.3.2009 09:56
An: Carsten Schiers <carsten@xxxxxxxxxx> ; xen-users 
<xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Betreff: RE: Another question about msi.



>-----Original Message-----
>From: Carsten Schiers [mailto:carsten@xxxxxxxxxx] 
>Sent: 2009年3月27日 16:53
>To: Jiang, Yunhong; xen-users
>Subject: AW: Another question about msi.
>
>Thanks, so I will give it a try. 
>
>In fact I never found someting in docs that say: don't use 
>shared-interrupt devices 
>in different domains. But you will find some hints in the 
>internet not to do so.

Yes, shared interrupt is much more complex, and may impact performance or even 
cause trouble sometimes, especially in some corner case. So if in a production 
environemnt, it is not a good idea to use it, I think. 

>
>I remeber something line an issue when shutting down a DomU 
>that includes one device, 
>that the other device doesn't work any longer, as the GSI is 
>disabled in Dom0. Might 
>be a bug. I never understand why it shouldn't work, as I think 
>the transfer from IRQ
>to event channel is done somewhere in Xen or Dom0.

Shared interrupt is quite tricky.

>
>My hope was that MSI will be much clearer, allowing me to use 
>the PCI slot, whilst
>the NICs are using MSI. Would be nice to put in another NIC or 
>TV or Fax or ...
>
>BR,
>Carsten.
>
>----- Originalnachricht -----
>Von: "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
>Gesendet: Fre, 27.3.2009 02:21
>An: Carsten Schiers <carsten@xxxxxxxxxx> ; xen-users 
><xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Betreff: RE: Another question about msi.
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Carsten Schiers [mailto:carsten@xxxxxxxxxx] 
>>Sent: 2009年3月27日 4:40
>>To: xen-users
>>Cc: Jiang, Yunhong
>>Subject: Another question about msi.
>>
>>Antoher question regarding MSI support.
>> 
>>When I have a motherboard where two PCIe slots and one PCI 
>>slot share an 
>>interrupt when using current
>>Xen and kernel with GSI, when I now use Xen 3.4-unstable and latest 
>>kernel, it will use the MSI (as the
>>Two PCIe slots are occupied by realtek NICs and their modules are MSI 
>>aware). Two different MSI show up 
>>in /proc/interrupts. 
>>
>>Does this now mean that I can pass-through the PCI slot into a 
>>pv DomU, 
>>because the GSI is now exclusively
>>used by the PCI slot (what I could not do before, as NICs shared GSI 
>>with the network cards)?
>
>I suspect even shared-interrupt devices can be assigned to 
>different guest.
>
>BTW, if a device can be assigned to a guest are determined by 
>many factor, like FLR support etc (at least for HVM domain).
>
>>
>>For your Info: Xen 3.3.1 and latest kernel will not work for me.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Carsten.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>