WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] VCPU amount


ok so if I want to make 3 domU: Terminal, Database, Mail on 8 core system

Terminal mast have 6 vcpus on demand with max priority, database and mail 1 vcpu each with minimum 1 core for both and max 2 cores for both (if Terminal is Idle, for better perfomence mail and database)
configs mast be:

Terminal:
vcpus=6
cpus='1-7' #0-core dom0
cpu_weight=65000
cpu_cap=600

Database/Mail is
vcpus=1
cpus='1-7' #0-core dom0
cpu_weight=256
cpu_cap=100

is it ok or may be better (for perfomence loss) do easier:

Terminal:
vcpus=6
cpus='1-6'
cpu_weight=65000
#cpu_cap=600

Database/Mail is
vcpus=1
cpus='7'
cpu_weight=256
cpu_cap=70 # for do not make domu to zero cpu if it idle ????




26 ÍÁÒÔÁ 2009, × 15:31, Fajar A. Nugraha ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ(Á):

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Vladislav Karpenko
<vladislav@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
1. If i have only one domU and make 2 configs for it with vcpu=1 and vcpu 8,
the domu will have same perfomance, yes?

Depends. In an oversimplified scenario where only CPU matters, then :

On a single core server : depending on the type of load, vcpus=8 will be slower.
Performance-wise, you should not create a domU with more vcpus than
available physical core.

On 8-core (or more) server : depending on the type of load, vcpus=8
will be much faster.

A special case is when on 8-core server and you set "cpu_cap=100" (or
less) on both domUs. In theory, they will have the same performance.
Again, this is only true if your xen version supports cpu_cap.

2. if i have 2 domu, one with vcpu=4 and second with vcpu=1, they will have same perfomance if one of them is idle, and half of perfomance if they are
both loaded?

No, see above.
If both domUs have the same vcpus, cpu_weight, and cpu_cap, then the
answer is yes.


3. the only way to limit load is cpu_cap and for QOS is cpu_weight?

vcpus and cpu_cap can limit cpu load.
Note that there are other factors that can affect system load, one of
the them is disk I/O.


3. May be you mistake with:

In theory you can have something like a domU with vcpu=7 (note that
dom0 should have it's own dedicated core),  cpu_weight=65000, and
cpu_cap=1, which should create a high-priority (cpu-wise) 7-way system
whose total performance equals to that of one cpu. It could be handy
for testing multi-threaded application to see how it performs in a
fast CPU vs many slow CPUs.


cpu_cap=1 - the system will have only 1% of 1 cpu power, may be mast be cpu_cap=x*100 (x is a number of cpu for domu) for high-priority (cpu-wise)
%x-way system

You're half right :)
To emulate a SMP system whose performance equal to one CPU, cpu_cap
should be 100.
Note that this is just an example to demonstrate vcpu vs cpu_cap.

For practical usage in your setup (you have 8 core system, right?) You
can simply :
- assign core 0 to dom0
- set domUs to use core 1-7
- distribute the load using vcpus, with each domU uses 7 or less
vcpus. For example : db -> vcpus=1, terminal server -> vcpus=6

That should give most performance.
If the total number of vcpus (on dom0 and domUs) are greater than
available physical cores, then you may want to start playing with
cpu_weight and cpu_cap.

Regards,

Fajar


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>