WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Hot Copy file based VMs

To: Javier Guerra <javier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Hot Copy file based VMs
From: Jan Kalcic <jandot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:20:57 +0100
Cc: Jan Kalcic <jandot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:21:43 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZD2y5HkVs7ctytauOlcBGPAQ5mKJzqD6/c9dN/x72FU=; b=ssdxrBDIQ1DFvmtaukmOkECNfWagDDVRaMXsXoMoids+IrHK4UzD56cf02L/oetXCp VrP/klmcHNNaQExQaiecrLwFngF7hRlGaO96SLQ+jtAgw0eApDriZwng5hce6gLbj21D UXQRbknNCrBSiVxR0Q7dXK/oqAUEMBMTSY6bQ=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=VCFinfizommWBtbbSbhDmTEf5Pl/eGj1uC4z/kTKRhXqFrmj4O0pE/b6yCIClTHldu Ra71TexlA73ZGUv01Wy9uj9N0sQfcSvL3u2fEErEUTnQgyFcfFvYdUgXUI/owTMwviP9 SSTs7FOpl92L9DVrJmF783YfxoDwYLpxXELDc=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <90eb1dc70903180857m3b93e5a3kac9f85ee0cd9c624@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <49C0C1D9.4020505@xxxxxxxxx> <90eb1dc70903180716p29e38044se5d1fec33b199545@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49C1174A.30907@xxxxxxxxx> <90eb1dc70903180857m3b93e5a3kac9f85ee0cd9c624@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
Javier Guerra wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Jan Kalcic <jandot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What do you mean with "atomic" copy?


when talking about storage (or data access in general), an operation
is 'atomic' from some point of view if it's 'indivisible'. that is,
there wasn't any point in time when it was 'halfway done'.

LVM snapshots manage this, because it's not a real copy (it's more
like a fork, but it works like a copy in most cases), and because it
taps the main stream of storage operations.

most other kinds of copy can't be really atomic, that's why Fajar
tells you to suspend the guest while you do the copy.  that way, even
if there was a time when the copy was half-done, the guest wasn't
really there, so from it's point of view, the copy was atomic.


I see. Really  thanks,
Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users