WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

[Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.28.7 domU: 32-bit emulation seems to

To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.28.7 domU: 32-bit emulation seems to be broken
From: Sven Köhler <sven.koehler@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:31:22 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:32:22 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PaKGTT4AeesI8LijHUJ1g9F2uI1+jPibYshQYDHCVqw=; b=EOyqN9AQNKPT+vQ/A3PKoH+RvruGNOvcBuBny3kuICyxbTlnhx6d+jwG2qeMvdP5O0 OJuLTltWc/qdkIUyy3zusKJQouPKzn2gT6wANG8xcKSNiNf5+U4LjHh8bkx4wQxIQHCs KyE/OSCWTa//j/FWJ5zN2dUqL46pgqhs9RLao=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HeM2wcrzJ0vyum2qHcKAH+AuplRxclIwuZK9VRs78KqyVgkZj99MqY5MmuBG6bCBt4 bGdZcn/uEb0z35yl9/DlikOHo9qDT29Od/qCaMttgBTFjPiLbKbrnruOjUXixWUhWbj4 0ST5kSblnYC3CbrHGIFfrbM+uRr7SQpAL8heU=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <49BFD56B.1040003@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <gpe0vg$j67$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <gpei6e$gcn$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49BAFC72.4040501@xxxxxxxx> <49BB0184.1020503@xxxxxxxx> <49BB6F4A.90000@xxxxxxxxx> <49BC2994.6040404@xxxxxxxx> <49BCF38B.3000507@xxxxxxxxx> <49BD2CCA.6070308@xxxxxxxx> <49BD3A87.3060403@xxxxxxxxx> <49BEB487.3090503@xxxxxxxx> <49BEB526.7060608@xxxxxxxx> <49BED2DE.7060203@xxxxxxxxx> <49BED46C.2040906@xxxxxxxx> <49BFAEFA.80605@xxxxxxxxx> <49BFD56B.1040003@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090128)
Jeremy Fitzhardinge schrieb:
OK, that confirms that its sysret32 that's failing. vdso32=0 on the kernel command line should be the workaround until we've got a proper fix.

vdso32=0 works. Thank you for your help!

But i wonder: what's the drawback of this workaround? Performance loss? Or something more dramatic?


Regards,
  Sven

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users