WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

RE: [Xen-users] Xen SAN Questions

To: "John Madden" <jmadden@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Xen SAN Questions
From: "Tait Clarridge" <Tait.Clarridge@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:25:08 -0500
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:27:13 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <EBEEB3C8FBD6B0448AEDF986B303BEB608B0CEA0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090127130801.31661de2mepyw329@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcmAqgUGED3LjvQrRECUxPxyDO4TvwAAfcWA
Thread-topic: [Xen-users] Xen SAN Questions
Hello John,

To answer your questions:

>Well, first off, ask yourself why you're using a cluster filesystem in  
>the first place.  Do you have active-active writers on the same  
>filesystem at the same time?  If the answer is no, then get rid of GFS  
>-- you don't need it.

The reason for this was so that I could have two Xen hosts using their local 
storage but to also have it replicating between servers for backup purposes. 
Maybe I was going about this the wrong way, but I wanted to have the ability to 
use the large storage pool (created by the cluster) as a platform for storing 
VMs as well as have it back everything up on two separate locations of disk.

>Second, what's this about DRDB *and* SAN?  Are the disks shared (SAN)  
>or DRDB (local RAID)?

To clarify, the disks themselves will be a RAID-5 local to each machine (1 
array per machine, 2 in total) with DRBD running between to sort of RAID-1 them 
over the network. Does that help? I want to take the local RAID from both 
machines and turn it into a SAN.

I was wondering whether using DRBD and a cluster filesystem would work better 
than using XFS+DRBD and exporting NFS.

Thanks for the quick response!

Best,
Tait



_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users