WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] new on xen.

To: "Robert Dunkley" <Robert@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] new on xen.
From: Mauro <mrsanna1@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:47:08 +0100
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:47:51 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=pt2dwC7FGXx435/mR98LJNUkNSgjxKhbnns1TZyFeH8=; b=Tl3uwEs37JqMmcU7lCfBoSNlS7eeRVeD9EicH5DRtDK6/h5+fOKEpRkgfhNtavuHjb +hlPdpNPnTQ/Mvqk+/2M6NUf6ScsVS5lT8TSh6Ac9+zBtNAxP9KcLGSu60Drz26k7pRo 5OHwHKQSGQ9MQ0x2wyAt9tqq3DFlkTHFpChKM=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=MUggd+LEh8gL4V/u6FbDmbOOqICNo7H923dctzHffWvz9epS5iyGyu4dnpC19f4YnH mHYl0b10HG79rPdI0jLBG5EviVxoFfC2AIL7aRZezGp4aZk9c8nPkTLO1YaYKNxqOdmn tdW5RKIJ6Kjdw+2hMs6ryR6jwDCXe4vGR4U0g=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C1EAC9C5E752D24C968FF091D446D8232DE535@ALTERNATEREALIT>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <ab520d140811121255v235aba78wa9cd51854bf2be57@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C1EAC9C5E752D24C968FF091D446D8232DE533@ALTERNATEREALIT> <ab520d140811130019l403c5ee0p7f360f4a9f24119b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C1EAC9C5E752D24C968FF091D446D8232DE534@ALTERNATEREALIT> <ab520d140811130038r35ae1cdo554846245ece152d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C1EAC9C5E752D24C968FF091D446D8232DE535@ALTERNATEREALIT>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


2008/11/13 Robert Dunkley <Robert@xxxxxxxxx>

Hi Mauro,

 

You would need to partition  the arrays in LVM if you needed more VMs. In the end it comes down to convenience versus performance, individual Raid 1s perform best when multiple VMs come under load but one large Raid array is easier to manage.


ok, thanks anche scuse me if I reply directly to you, I forget to do a reply-all.
Last thing...do you suggest only raid1 stripes instead of raid1+0?
Because my controller give me raid5 and raid1+0 choices.
I have a Smart Array P400 SAS/SATA Controller in a HP Proliant DL 580 G5.


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>