Re: [Xen-users] xm top strange values

To:	xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [Xen-users] xm top strange values
From:	"Alexandre Biancalana" <biancalana@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:38:34 -0300
Delivery-date:	Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:39:13 -0700
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=ZJhkb//3hJ6ph/tGS4IvhPzC6nG5YIStlCPmyvKAKIk=; b=CGvkuRLg3qxsd6DoWuhVm7cgmVyj0Q7GvGvw8Ndves7OEgqFarJ8EzAvyUKZ0LCTIr J+is1+u2kGy9bTplGdoI8Mpt0EimUid/FChAMEdxed4P6cNoeBae6QDv5teJe+FkxZJZ 2aAJF0S+Q6R+TbOVDW8IwNFhKRoTa7FPqn6Kk=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=SlTWiIqjTURdRNA1naXiVXLykqLGn8lB9vOf3/8BvIVpbarBvlgIHus6bbNGO1b+Gy Z4Ddtse7IbxKwN6M6rxPxvNIRl5Timnh/9VPiDJ5yj4Xr1WG1QsggTF9uSTzgWZLtjQF XHR4ygMoKLtOWbop7gKFDS08qfy6wCzimV0r8=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<93bc4af40809241403k6f3a6895u64de66eca09fb448@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<8e10486b0809241102g4fcde3f8ybe427076e80914d1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1222289139.4265.134.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <93bc4af40809241403k6f3a6895u64de66eca09fb448@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On 9/24/08, Dot Yet <dot.yet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Thomas Karcher <thkarcher@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > >   Looking at xm top I see strange values for cpu(%) column:
> >
> > >   Is normal the cpu usage goes above 100% or Am I misunderstanding
> something ?
> >
> > 100% is _one_ CPU with maximum load. Guess you have a multicore machine
> > and assigned more than one processor to your VMs.
> >
> >
> > Thomas
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-users mailing list
> > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> >
>
>
> i have seen it go upto 175% on a dual core cpu. i think its just giving a
> sum of all the cores involved.

Why xm top shows 395% of processor use and inside my vm windows task
manager shows 5% of processor used ?

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] xm top strange values