WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

[Xen-users] Re: Windows Disk performance

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-users] Re: Windows Disk performance
From: Christian Tramnitz <chris.ace@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 09:46:04 +0200
Delivery-date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 00:47:00 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4849D559.8000805@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4849D559.8000805@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)
Ruslan Sivak schrieb:
I've been getting disappointing results on IO reads when using windows guests. I'm getting usually around 70MB/s reads using hdtune. When installing James' PV drivers, the speed drops to about 20MB/s. The host system is getting around 350MB/s reads. I'm wondering if there is such a significant slowdown, or if my tests are somehow flawed. The 70MB/s persisted throughout my VM testing, whether I was using Xen, XenSource or VMWare Server.
So my questions are:

a. Is there a bottleneck somewhere which basically caps the windows disk performance? b. Is my testing methodology flawed. Is there a better windows tool that will measure performance? What about Linux tool? I'm currently using hdparm -t

Russ

Hi Russ,

first of all let's clarify:
- Is this Mb as in "Megabits per second" or MB as in "Megabytes per second"? You stated both in your original post in the 0.95 driver thread, so I want to make sure... - Did you use the same measurement/tools in all 3 scenarios (dom0, domU/stock, domU/gplpv)? If yes how exactly? (I'm not aware of hdtune for linux, so you most probably ran something else to get dom0 performance)

I think the answer to #2 will explain the big difference between dom0 and domU performance (taking into account a bit of a general overhead).

When it comes to PV driver's performance this is an interesting topic. I've seen posts giving the opposite (not exact numbers but direction) result, so it would be interesting to find out what causes this.



Best regards,
   Christian


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users