|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] File system layout
 
Mark Williamson wrote:
 
My supervisor wants to create a LV then give that to a VM and then
create a VG with LV's under it inside the VM. I have read on the list
where this will give bad performance inside the VM.
     
 
 It won't necessarily give *bad* performance but doing the two layers of 
translation is a bit unfortunate.
   
 
An email from Sadique on this list sometime early this year said LVM has 2%
 performance hit over pysical partitions. So using LVM on both dom0 and 
domU (roughly) reduce performance by 4%.
 To me, the simplicity of doing all LVM management in dom0 and hiding it from 
the guest appeals.  
 
 It's 
actually possible to pass separate LVM volumes to appear as individual 
partitions in the guest - this has the advantage that there's no MS-DOS 
partition table to worry about, just a load of linear LVs with filesystems 
on.
   
 
I second that. That is what we do for Linux PV guests.
Regards,
Fajar
 
 
smime.p7s 
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature 
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users 
 |   
 
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |