Re: [Xen-users] Xen-Unstable 3.2 no xenbr0 no vif

> On Dec 11, 2007 2:23 AM, Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:
> At some point the configuration changed so that the default bridge is
> called "eth0", presumably in order to break less tools that assume "eth0"
> as the primary network interface.

On Tue December 11 2007 5:22:49 am Emre Erenoglu wrote:
> Thanks for your mail. I understood now that it's the case. In fact, when I
> put eth0 as the bridge name in xen domU conf files, the DomU booted OK.
>
> However, this shall be loudly "announced" somewhere, I'm sure many people
> can ask the same question.

It's not even in the comments for /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp, which still makes 
reference to xenbr0. This and the new /dev/xv* devices are just some of the 
reasons that the 3.0 docs shipped with all distros I use, or the urls below, 
are not making it anymore.

http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/research/srg/netos/xen/readmes/user/user.html

The links on this page (same code, apparently) don't work anymore:
http://xen.org/xen/documentation.html
http://xen.xensource.com/documentation.html

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-users] Xen-Unstable 3.2 no xenbr0 no vif, Emre Erenoglu Re: [Xen-users] Xen-Unstable 3.2 no xenbr0 no vif, Mark Williamson Re: [Xen-users] Xen-Unstable 3.2 no xenbr0 no vif, Emre Erenoglu Re: [Xen-users] Xen-Unstable 3.2 no xenbr0 no vif, jim burns <=

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-users] multiple dom0s (was: Re: [Xen-devel] ragarding xen in sles10), jim burns

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-users] Xen, HVM guest won't start without VNC=1, jim burns

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-users] Xen-Unstable 3.2 no xenbr0 no vif, Emre Erenoglu

Next by Thread:

[Xen-users] Windows XP on Linux domain0, Szabolcs Feczak

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]