WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

[Xen-users] Re: domU has better I/O performance than dom0?

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-users] Re: domU has better I/O performance than dom0?
From: Troels Arvin <troels@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:39:20 +0000 (UTC)
Delivery-date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 04:40:29 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <pan.2007.11.28.11.38.27@xxxxxxxx> <20071128122754.GB30458@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black)
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:27:54 +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
> The commandline was
> 
> /usr/sbin/bonnie -d . -s 0.130 -n 8096 -r 8096

You are measuring file creation rate, and not "raw I/O throughput", 
right? In that sense, your tests are different from what I measured. 
Still, your results are certainly strange. I wonder if they would be 
equally strange if you ran them on different non-virtualized servers.

-- 
Regards,
Troels Arvin <troels@xxxxxxxx>
http://troels.arvin.dk/


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users