Re: [Xen-users] domU kernel

[Steve Wray <steve.wray@xxxxxxxxx>]

Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Steve Wray wrote:
> > Christian Horn wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 12:14:02AM -0400, IDAGroup - R.W.Muller wrote:
> > > > Hi, I found lots of threads where people talk about domU kernel 
> > > > sitting in /boot of dom0.
[snip]
> > cons: Security. You now have a domU in which a local exploit could 
> > result in code being executed in dom0 at the next boot of that domU. 
> > By the way, this actually happened. See CVE-2007-4993
> > IMHO putting the kernel in domU and using pygrub was always asking for 
> > trouble.
> > In my opinion it is completely crazy to expose dom0 to potential 
> > exploits from domU.
> > So far as I am aware this is the *only* way to so expose dom0 to domU 
> > security holes and I am deeply shocked if it is true that "One sees 
> > mostly this nowadays"
> There's a big advantage to pygrub: kernel update procedures for DomU 
> have nothing to do with Dom0's kernel. This prevents version and feature 
> conflicts with package management sytems, and allows updates and reboots 
> of DomU without having to write to Dom0. This was particularly 
I don't believe that the convenience of this outweighs the undeniable 
security implications.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users