WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

[Xen-users] Re: XEN and Windows Guests in critical environment(hospital)

To: James Harper <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-users] Re: XEN and Windows Guests in critical environment(hospital)
From: Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 07:01:02 +0100
Cc: Ligesh <myself@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jordi Espasa Clofent <sistemes.llistes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 22:56:09 -0700
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uMMtYcOielmzM/CowL3OjAcHuKpBTd/BibR+VuByxJi6sWhZOrS4rEBj7t1ao7DZZyv++OruaBAXHpuIROiLziQ8nds8vLjfVxHLADDOGEHWdmo+gD8yB2b+URZt/XljV4vKlVE9DoVc6cz2EJvYBnjWpqAWg+1yYzeECjudtmo=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=i2iKR4rArnZKby8D7+850WUijqnxTnvQqpOMYAgUTSz38dRGfq5F8gsfHWoxkqlK3Tm0EKkqN9u7vlHm2eg2U12S1ngzf8XF4tJggaMkvVpbtqF8VhYEZ5E3Jv1bKXsFOHtD386zbRiQHeLlDv/QdNXIMv86XEoNDVl6KxBDFY4=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01166BD8@trantor>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <467CFE8F.9010501@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01166BD7@trantor> <20070623131951.GA6011@xxxxxxxxxx> <467D5A35.2040001@xxxxxxxxx> <20070623201616.GA11755@xxxxxxxxxx> <467D942F.4040106@xxxxxxxxx> <20070623220624.GA12722@xxxxxxxxxx> <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01166BD8@trantor>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509)
James Harper wrote:

So I agree with you that the application will almost certainly work and
work perfectly, but everyone is very sensitive about legal
responsibilities these days, and if someone died and it was determined
that a computer failure caused the results of a medical test to be lost
or delayed and that that was a contributing factor to their death, and
it turns out that you used an unsupported system configuration to run
the software on, then take a guess what happens next - the fact that it
wasn't Xen or VMWare's fault will have nothing to do with the outcome of
the inquiry...
Heh. Yeah, been there. I used to design medical electronics for neural implants. All the designs had to be very belt-and-suspenders, and there was often a trade-off between keeping things the way they were, and keeping things supported or robust against the next potential threat. Since one of my first systems adminstration tasks was cleaning up after the Morris Worm, partly because I had specifically been forbidden from implementing the available system security patches to avoid any complicatons in a BSD 4.3 controlled neural stimulator, I got to see the booby traps of local configuration issues up close and personal.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users