RE: [Xen-users] Make error

["Ian Tobin" <itobin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

yes your correct, it was set to PC-compatable, i have changed that to XEN and it is now compiling.

 

not sure how you figured that out but thanks :)

 

---

From: Petersson, Mats [mailto:Mats.Petersson@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Tue 22/05/2007 12:45
To: James Harper; Ian Tobin; xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Make error

> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Harper [mailto:james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 22 May 2007 12:30
> To: Petersson, Mats; Ian Tobin; xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Make error
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ian Tobin [mailto:itobin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: 22 May 2007 12:00
> > > To: Petersson, Mats; xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Make error
> > >
> > > thanks Matts, just so you know this is  a Dell PE1750 2.4 Xeon.
> >
> > And that will make what difference? It should still build.
> >
>
> It could make the world of difference... aren't there a few different
> flavours that come under the i386 architecture? Certainly I
> don't think
> you'd reproduce a problem from arch/i386 on a powerpc or amd64.

What MACHINE it is won't make much of a difference (afaik Linux doesn't
have any logic to figure out what the hardware looks like much beyond
figuring which model and mode of processor it is being run on). The
architecture being built for is a different matter.

>
> A copy of the .config is probably required to reproduce the problem
> though... as well as the version of gcc etc in use.

Possibly, but I've just repro'd the problem (although, as you say,
x86_64 build doesn't have the same problem!)

And I believe I know what the problem is too: The subarchitecture in the
config isn't set to "Xen" but "PC-compatible".

--
Mats
>
> James

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users