 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Alternative to bridge
| To: | "adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] Alternative to bridge |
| From: | "Henning Sprang" <henning_sprang@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:52:06 +0200 |
| Cc: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:50:48 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=QeFXO+YIN+m9nn/H+1hbEKHlMJQQkuDdEp/LFpWBNeUmJU3e0i+KRRMWly5C5bgJ7LqEKPyNic5slpu6twXDShbTqj0a/YyGltDj1GluXCnUYpmHCDWGvldVP5kAXBWF2kF2eqDYAWgK4JaoNRamhLec1C1w2HvDhtwLK8C/YHM= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=llP4lRfsnCeeo2RHyphqL6Y7dFsTYrBzKnjI/1zmY8TJR21SkK1Xvljjov0FdRkdR7YodYYbyrBXQLNf7uSR+2sbVUE9x4E6mS919B4ddF3UbmVA3prHLOccuceEwFwW7FTT+vFcd+2wScdcnzlMR+MW9ikz0PBWK29r5H6ZSqs= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4176148.719871176903637715.JavaMail.servlet@kundenserver> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <4176148.719871176903637715.JavaMail.servlet@kundenserver> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On 4/18/07, adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: I need hubs instead of switches. What do you mean exactly? Can you specify which exact behaviour/functionality you are missing? Does anybody know if a similar setup is also possible with Xen? In general, Xen networking has a routed, natted, and bridged mode. Things that are supported by the Linux Kernel. It might exist but I don't know of "hub" networking functions in the kernel. If there's Kernel function for it, and userspace tools to administer them, you can write your own network script. Henning _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Xen-users] 4gb seg fixup errors in Debian (usual hints don'tseem to work), Fermín Galán Márquez |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [Xen-users] VM's dont start, Petersson, Mats |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-users] Alternative to bridge, adrian |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] Alternative to bridge, Adrian Lambeck |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
