 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
[Xen-users] Re: file-backed vs. block device performance
| To: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-users] Re: file-backed vs. block device performance |
| From: | "Mark Greenbank" <mark.greenbank@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 3 Apr 2007 09:16:39 -0400 |
| Delivery-date: | Tue, 03 Apr 2007 06:15:41 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=PGoqrhDpN0F50z3V6xQbSy3I98h0VSw/SiZehAOTPMdy2c6bpEaiWbUG+sP0w0zSJckDPSUcF/rOasVBO5wKxIrSgih0R0/Z9CBZ6BhltUMhK6PE1yEi9V2Qlag5/xysq2p4FqjKI+WRe9+uvE+9sjedbIOhInJFjut8rkAf/JA= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=nKRP6/AOoPn3bCNk5SnFtge6abcBOOELQ684dYNbCIYWStlJQzRo9yXWayDg2YbUiWkYNQh2RCm+BcHbc+LsZmfhx3fQg7JhEjzqf9Dva6tcJTWMbBXIM6ZA1Ys/P9lAfn7c+6yUc9NHBOU89TPzYO1hMVh189H3iJsi8CWNLqk= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4110a4f0703271012k6687c8b1ndfd80611f78a0f37@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <4110a4f0703271012k6687c8b1ndfd80611f78a0f37@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
Hi again, Since I've not heard anything I'm assuming that no metrics exist, right? Would it be appropriate to do a small test? Is anyone interested? I was thinking of setting up and file-backed and partition-backed domain and running lmbench to do some simple benchmarking -- does this sound appropriate? mark On 3/27/07, Mark Greenbank <mark.greenbank@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hi, _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-users] sles9sp3 DomU don't appear Partition table, Maged Mahmoud |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-users] Re: problem in networking, rahul gundecha |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-users] sles9sp3 DomU don't appear Partition table, Maged Mahmoud |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] Re: file-backed vs. block device performance, Marco Mililotti |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
