WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] can connect *from* Windows, can't connect *to* Windows

To: "Henning Sprang" <henning_sprang@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] can connect *from* Windows, can't connect *to* Windows
From: "Tomasz Chmielewski" <mangoo@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:00:12 +0100 (CET)
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 06:00:53 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <5bb00b3f0611300547y17b1f640rfa5896552258d266@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <55247.192.168.111.143.1164798442.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5bb00b3f0611300547y17b1f640rfa5896552258d266@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8
> On 11/29/06, Tomasz Chmielewski <tch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> [...]
>> The other way doesn't work - I can't connect to Windows from dom0, or
>> form
>> any other machine from LAN. The only thing that Windows replies to is
>> arping.
>
> Hmm, then basically your ethernet setup is there and most of the
> routing part, also.
>
> There are some possible sources of errors.
>
> What does your Xen network setup look like? Bridged or routed
> networking? Firewall on the Windows machine?

Shame on me, it was the firewall in Windows 2003 R2 that was enabled... I
though it was disabled by default, and I didn't check it, because VNC
works a bit of crappy (mouse pointer goes as it likes, not as I like).

Still, network on Windows looks problematic:

1. Latency is very big - this is made from domU:

# ping 192.168.111.186
PING 192.168.111.186 (192.168.111.186) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.111.186: icmp_seq=1 ttl=128 time=4.06 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.111.186: icmp_seq=2 ttl=128 time=4.82 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.111.186: icmp_seq=3 ttl=128 time=6.25 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.111.186: icmp_seq=4 ttl=128 time=7.70 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.111.186: icmp_seq=5 ttl=128 time=9.14 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.111.186: icmp_seq=6 ttl=128 time=0.580 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.111.186: icmp_seq=7 ttl=128 time=2.01 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.111.186: icmp_seq=8 ttl=128 time=3.49 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.111.186: icmp_seq=9 ttl=128 time=4.89 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.111.186: icmp_seq=10 ttl=128 time=6.33 ms

--- 192.168.111.186 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9000ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.580/4.931/9.144/2.437 ms


For non-HVM guests I have latency of about 0.074 ms.


2. There are slight packet losses:

# ping -c 10000 -f 192.168.111.186
PING 192.168.111.186 (192.168.111.186) 56(84) bytes of data.
................
--- 192.168.111.186 ping statistics ---
10000 packets transmitted, 9984 received, 0% packet loss, time 4708ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.295/0.400/9.534/0.345 ms, ipg/ewma 0.470/0.438 ms


For non-HVM guestes I have no packet losses.


But perhaps, it'd be a better idea to ask about it in a separate thread.

-- 
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org



_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>