WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

[Xen-users] Re: preferred hardware for xen?

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-users] Re: preferred hardware for xen?
From: "Gabor Szokoli" <szocske@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:59:37 +0200
Delivery-date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 05:00:24 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=f9ybUgvQaaXwBhTkyDGNHslZH/NZAhP41Uzjld9A0iwYSJnpx3FeWe7h5xlM8dqyLIlx3AAKdJRi3MmjupbK7pP5yge2CzokCOUdL4bWXpCmGUHTM6zTDPuRfH2wVBoRRZMgac1d8Tb9pYb4e7gYcw/8+AgyXBsmyGOR1jSedzw=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <de47c0230608140415j6813b522pfda64583139e3c60@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <de47c0230608140415j6813b522pfda64583139e3c60@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
OK, so I did not check the xen-devel list properly, it is clearly
noted there that the new schedulers in unstable should solve the soft
lockup issue.
Still, I am open to suggestions on our pending xen-friendly server purchase:

On 8/14/06, Gabor Szokoli <szocske@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
2, We plan to purchase a few new servers to slice up. Should we look
for something with vanderpool? Pacifica? Anything else we should
insist on to increase the probablility of xen working on it fine?
Anything we should make sure is not in them? More or fewer CPUs/cores
the better?


Thanks for any tips or advice:

Gabor Szokoli

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>