WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

[Xen-users] Couple of questions

To: Xen List <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-users] Couple of questions
From: Alan Murrell <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 02:49:54 -0700
Delivery-date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 02:53:15 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516)
Hey All,

I am contemplating an upgrade of my Xen-unstable host (using 2.0.x series code) to Xen-3.0.x, and had a couple of questions.

1.) Live Migration: Does it matter what sort of "backend" the DomU's are using (i.e., physical drive, LVM, file-based)? I thought maybe it worked similar to VMware int hat it copied the file containing the system over, but of that is the case then that would not work for LVM-based systems, would it?

2.) MythTV: I saw one setup where someone was able to get a MythTV backend running on the 2.0.x series of the unstable code; is anyone running a MythTV backend on the 3.0.x series code (either stable or unstable)?

Thanks, in advance!

-Alan

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>