WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

[Xen-users] VT or paravirtualization?

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-users] VT or paravirtualization?
From: Czakó Krisztián <slapic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 22:03:03 +0100
Delivery-date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:12:22 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Pilátus-Comp Kft.
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello,

What is the better solution now to run linux domUs under Xen3?
Using a VT hardware, sould I install a xen-patched kernel as I would
where no VT extension, or use an unmodified linux guest system?

Is there any performance difference between a Pentium D 3 Ghz with vt
(9xx) and without it (8xx)? 

Regards,
Slapic



_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>