|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Re: cow implementation 
| On 1/10/06, Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
Anand wrote:> Alright i guess i should just keep my distance with lvm now.
 
 Suit yourself, hehe.
 Hehe do i have a choice ? I am looking for a stable solution wherein there will be many domains. So if lvm2 with snapshots is creating problems as you say so, i don't have much choice. I tried only couple of times with lvm2 snapshots and they didn't cause any problems. This is a centos 
4.1 box.
 
 > What are you using then ?
 Uhm, tar+gzip and a differ for now :-)...
 
 I'll admit it's far from optimal :-).
 
huh ? i have to say it just went over my head. Care to fly a little low so i can understand something about it ? ;)
 
 --
 
 regards,
 
 Anand
 _______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users | 
 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |  | 
Re: [Xen-users] Re: cow implementation, (continued)
Message not availableRe: [Xen-users] Re: cow implementation, Anand
Re: [Xen-users] Re: cow implementation, Anand
Re: [Xen-users] Re: cow implementation, Molle Bestefich
Re: [Xen-users] Re: cow implementation, Anand
Re: [Xen-users] Re: cow implementation, Molle Bestefich
Re: [Xen-users] Re: cow implementation,
Anand <=
Re: [Xen-users] Re: cow implementation, Molle Bestefich
Re: [Xen-users] Re: cow implementation, Anand
Re: [Xen-users] Re: cow implementation, Molle Bestefich
Re: [Xen-users] Re: cow implementation, David H
Re: [Xen-users] Re: cow implementation, Molle Bestefich
Re: [Xen-users] Re: cow implementation, Anand
Re: [Xen-users] Re: cow implementation, Molle Bestefich
Re: [Xen-users] Re: cow implementation, Anand
Re: [Xen-users] Re: cow implementation, Anand
Re: [Xen-users] Re: cow implementation, Sipos Ferenc
 |  |  | 
  
    |  |  |