WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] xen 3.0 testing ACPI problems / no PCI functionality

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] xen 3.0 testing ACPI problems / no PCI functionality
From: Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:51:10 +0000
Cc: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Patrick <patrick_@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 21:09:46 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <43C2ACB1.3090701@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D40A066@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <43C2ACB1.3090701@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.9.1
> thats rubbish .. if you cant tell me what should be up with my config,
> then better dont say anything at all. You even did not listen that I
> compiled a vanilla kernel with the kernel config that does NOT work with
> xen, but with the vanilal kernel PCI works goddamn fine.

Running on Xen isn't the same as running the vanilla kernel!  Some options 
that you can select on vanilla Linux will certainly break things on Xen, so 
just trying the same config doesn't necessarily mean there's not a problem in 
there somewhere.

> Secondly, if you read my posts before more carefully then you'd know
> that my bios supports ACPI and that the xen kernel (although without
> PCI) boots but then it's rebooting and saying that I didnt not allocated
> enough memory for the memory reservation of dom0 (while without apci
> enabled it doesnt do this and boots fine, just without PCI).

OK, so that means something's not working as it should, nobody disputes that.  
It's still not much information to go on, though.

Not all ACPI implementations are equally well-behaved.  It's possible there's 
something odd about yours.

If you try the -xen kernel config it provides a *reference point* for 
debugging your other problems: all you have to do to provide this reference 
point is build a kernel with the standard config, copy the kernel to the 
right place and try booting.

> Thus its neither a fault of my config nor of anything else that is
> related to my person, but only to xen and its faultiness.

If Xen doesn't work on your machine then it means either: a) something in your 
config is producing unexpected behaviour or b) something unusual about your 
hardware is producing unexpected behaviour.

This problem doesn't happen for other people, and nobody else has your machine 
or your config, so unless you help us folks on the mailing list out in 
diagnosing what's wrong they're not going to be *able* to help you get the 
problem fixed (assuming they still want to).

Cheers,
Mark

>
> Patrick
>
> Ian Pratt wrote:
> >>FFS .. I do not care about ACPI .. now I ask you the _second
> >>time_ to refer to my PCI problem as without PCI nothing works at all.
> >
> >If you use one of our kernels PCI will likely work fine. If you've got a
> >broken bios that doesn't do acpi then disable it with acpi=off on the
> >xen command line. I'd much rather help you get something working with a
> >known good kernel than trying to second guess all the possible ways you
> >could have botched your own config...
> >
> >Ian
> >
> >>Patrick
> >>
> >>Ian Pratt wrote:
> >>>>First of all .. as I said ACPI was the reason why my mashine was
> >>>>constantly rebooting as - if ACPI enabled - xen does did not detect
> >>>>the amount of RAM properly and thus is always claiming it wasnt
> >>>>enough.
> >>>>Sencondly, the xen kernel config is not that much different
> >>
> >>to mine ..
> >>
> >>>>my kernel is just more lightweight tho.
> >>>>...
> >>>>ACPI isnt the main problem, could you please also refer to
> >>
> >>the second
> >>
> >>>>problem, which is of much more importance to me?
> >>>
> >>>Can you not just put 'acpi=off' on the *xen* command line (not the
> >>>linux one)?
> >>>
> >>>Please try this with the -xen kernel.
> >>>
> >>>Ian
> >>>
> >>>>best regards,
> >>>>Patrick
> >>>>
> >>>>Ian Pratt wrote:
> >>>>>>I just encountered that the xen 3.0 testing (from the mercurial
> >>>>>>repository) will not work if I have ACPI compiled into the kernel.
> >>>>>>Although the kernel will build properly, I cant boot it,
> >>
> >>as xen is
> >>
> >>>>>>constantly moaning about the amount of memory reservated
> >>>>
> >>>>for dom0 and
> >>>>
> >>>>>>thus is rebooting again and again (the appropiate settings
> >>>>
> >>>>are given
> >>>>
> >>>>>>and correct).
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Any reason not to be using our -xen kernel config? It has
> >>>>
> >>>>ACPI and sems
> >>>>
> >>>>>to work fine for the almost everyone.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Ian
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>I confirmed this by NOT compiling ACPI into my kernel at
> >>>>
> >>>>all .. then
> >>>>
> >>>>>>xen boots up fine... BUT then I do not have PCI
> >>>>
> >>>>functionality at all
> >>>>
> >>>>>>(which means lspci is empty and all my PCI devices do not
> >>>>
> >>>>work, even
> >>>>
> >>>>>>not if I try to load the appropiate driver manually). Again the
> >>>>>>settings (config) are compiled in and correctly set (which simply
> >>>>>>means I wasnt a jerk and forgot compiling PCI support in tho).
> >>>>>>I am using sis5513 as mainboard chipset and another
> >>>>
> >>>>confirmation on my
> >>>>
> >>>>>>side, as far as the problerm above's concerned, is that I tried
> >>>>>>exactly the same kernel config (without the xen config symbols of
> >>>>>>course) and compiled a vanilla 2.6.12.6 kernel manually ..
> >>>>
> >>>>it boots up
> >>>>
> >>>>>>fine and PCI support is also given, while doing the same with a
> >>>>>>xen-patched kernel will not work at all and results in pci
> >>>>>>non-functionality.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Any further confirmation about the two problems I mentioned above
> >>>>>>would be appreciated.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>best regards,
> >>>>>>Patrick
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>>>Xen-users mailing list
> >>>>>>Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users